Hot Topics
Employee Free Choice Act
Resource Library
The Case for Arbitration in Labor Law Reform | The Case for Arbitration in Labor Law Reform |
|
|
Labor law reform must help create a level playing field that gives workers and employers incentives to reach an agreement on contracts. Arbitration will help break through the status quo, eliminating unfair delays and conflicts that too often occur during contract negotiations. The Employee Free Choice Act establishes strong rules and fair umpires that help workers and employers come to agreement, involving the process of arbitration as a last resort. Arbitration Is Needed to Ensure that Workers and Companies Come Together to Agree on a Contract in a Reasonable Period of TimeOne year after a successful union election, workers in 52 percent of workplaces still do not have a contract. According to Cornell University researcher Kate Bronfenbrenner, 52 percent of workplaces had no collective bargaining agreement one year after a successful election. Two years after an election, 37 percent of workers’ unions were still without a contract.1
Arbitration Will Give Both Companies and Workers the Ability to Request a Mediator to
Help Ensure a Contract is Reached
Arbitrators Do Not Impose Unfair Terms in Contracts Arbitration does not result in higher wage increases than contracts negotiated voluntarily. Data from Canada show there is little difference in wage increases between arbitrated contracts and those negotiated voluntarily. In Ontario, the average annual wage increase was three percent for arbitrated contracts and 2.6 percent for negotiated contracts in the private sector. In Quebec, the average annual wage increase for both arbitrated and negotiated private sector contracts was 2.1 percent, and in Newfoundland the increase was 2.9 percent for both arbitrated and negotiated contracts in the public and private sectors. Finally, for private sector employers covered under the federal jurisdiction, the average annual wage increase for arbitrated agreements was 2.4 percent, while the negotiated wage increases averaged 2.2 percent.4 Many Businesses that Oppose the Employee Free Choice Act Support Using Arbitration when it Works to Their Advantage More than a dozen business groups praised arbitration as efficient and effective. In May 2008, more than a dozen business trade groups wrote a letter to Congress stating, “Arbitration is an efficient, effective, and less expensive means of resolving disputes for consumers, employers, investors, employees and franchisees, in addition to the many businesses that use the same system to resolve business disputes.”5 Businesses that oppose the Employee Free Choice Act include binding arbitration in their consumer agreements.
Many businesses that oppose labor law reform, including Home Depot, WalMart, Lowe’s, and Bank of America, have binding arbitration clauses in their credit card terms and other consumer agreements.6
|
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
| Employee Free Choice Act |
| Latest Updates |
| Resource Library |
| Allies Taking Action |
| News |
A growing, bipartisan coalition of policymakers supports the Employee Free Choice Act, federal legislation that would ensure workers have a free choice and a fair chance to form a union.
|