Hot Topics
Employee Free Choice Act
Resource Library
Why Mediation & Arbitration Rules are Needed | Why Mediation & Arbitration Rules are Needed |
|
|
Under current law, anti-union employers often drag workers through lengthy negotiations by delaying bargaining sessions, withholding relevant information, and putting forth bogus proposals. Even though these tactics are illegal, there are no effective deterrents to prevent “surface bargaining.” The Employee Free Choice Act would help ensure that workers and employers reach a first contract in a responsible period of time. First contract mediation and arbitration is necessary because management can hinder employee free choice by refusing to bargain. Even when employees surmount the many obstacles to forming a union, management frequently denies them the benefits of collective bargaining by refusing to agree on a first contract.
First contract mediation and arbitration is needed because
current law provides no effective remedies against management's refusal
to bargain. Management understands that it can get away with
suppressing employees' collective bargaining rights through bad faith
or surface bargaining because there is virtually no legal deterrent.
The possibility of mediation and arbitration rules will encourage management and employees’ unions to bargain productively on their own.
2 John Logan, "Consultants, Lawyers and the 'Union Free' Movement in the USA Since the 1970s," Industrial Relations Journal, vol. 33, no. 3, 2002. 3 Human Rights Watch, "Unfair Advantage: Workers' Freedom of Association in the United States Under International Human Rights Standards," 2000. |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
| Employee Free Choice Act |
| Latest Updates |
| Resource Library |
| Allies Taking Action |
| News |
A growing, bipartisan coalition of policymakers supports the Employee Free Choice Act, federal legislation that would ensure workers have a free choice and a fair chance to form a union.