Home arrow Hot Topics arrow Eye on the NLRB
Eye on the NLRB
Employers Threaten, Coerce, and Bribe Employees to Bust Their Unions
Written by Erin Johansson   
August 31, 2004

When employees collectively decide that they no longer wish to be represented by a union, they have the ability under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) to vote to revoke union representation at their workplace.  This process, known as a decertification, is expressly intended for workers to initiate, not employers.  While it is illegal for employers to orchestrate a decertification election to rid employees of their union, they can use their position of power to break the law with little fear of the consequences. 

Read More
 
A Legal "Union Avoidance" Strategy for Employers: The Appeals Process
Written by Erin Johansson   
July 31, 2004

Workers at Pearson Educational, Inc. in Indianapolis have been in limbo since they voted for union representation six years ago.  It all started in June of 1998, when a majority of warehouse and distribution workers chose union representation.  Instead of accepting the results of the election and negotiating wages, benefits, and working conditions with its employees, the company chose to appeal, resulting in a delay that stalled bargaining for years.  On July 6, 2004, the appeals process was exhausted, the result of the election was confirmed, and the company was finally ordered to bargain six years after the workers voted for union representation.

Read More
 
Weakness of Labor Law Remedies Undermines Workers' Rights
Written by Erin Johansson   
June 30, 2004

What would prevent a corporation from lying to shareholders about profits if its only punishment was to promise it wouldn't lie again?  Sadly, when a company violates labor law, often the company's only punishment is to post a notice promising not to break the law again.  With remedies like this, there is little to deter employers from violating labor law.  In May 2004, the NLRB ordered just such a remedy, and if anything, it sent a message to nurses in Albany, NY, that the law does little to protect their rights. 

Read More
 
No Guarantee of Timely Union Election Process for U.S. Workers
Written by Erin Johansson   
May 31, 2004

On September 18, 2003, workers at New York Display & Die Cutting Corp. cast ballots to decide on union representation.  Yet even with just 26 ballots cast, it wasn’t until June 3, 2004—more than eight months after the election—that the results were announced. The workers at the sign and display production company expected and deserved a swift resolution, but were instead forced to hold their breath awaiting the election outcome. 

Read More
 
Labor Law Remedies Come Too Little, Too Late
Written by Erin Johansson   
April 30, 2004

David Snead worked for Hewlett Packard (HP) for years with a clean work record.  Then in February 2002, he discussed the idea of forming a union with his co-workers. Not long after his supervisors learned of David’s efforts to organize a union, they illegally fired him for misconduct he had not committed, according to a recently issued decision of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).

Read More
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next > End >>

Results 71 - 75 of 75

What's New

Advertisement

What is the NLRB?

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) is a federal agency responsible for protecting workers' rights to form unions and promoting collective bargaining.

 

»  More about the NLRB

About the Author

Erin Johansson Erin Johansson writes our Eye on the NLRB blog.  Erin has worked as a Senior Research Associate at American Rights at Work since 2004 and is the author of some of our reports.  

 

» Learn more about Erin.

One Million Strong for the Employee Free Choice Act

One Million Strong for the Employee Free Choice Act

 

» Sign our petition for the Employee Free Choice Act

Connect with Us

  del.icio.us  facebook  youtube

  technorati_32x32.png  twitter  flickr