|
Written by Erin Johansson
|
|
November 12, 2007 |
|
In 1984, a Subcommittee of the House of Representatives adopted a report called "The Failure of Labor Law—A Betrayal of American Workers," which stated the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) “has ceased to accomplish its purpose…. The evidence is clear that the law does not encourage collective bargaining. Rather it has become an impediment.” But first and foremost, the law doesn’t even begin to protect the fundamental right of workers to organize unions.
For example…
- The NLRA does little, if anything, to discourage the intimidation,
threats, and reprisal faced by workers seeking union representation.
Anti-union consultants, advisors, and lawyers have developed aggressive
approaches to stop workers from forming unions through harassing and
punitive tactics. Some unionbusters advise
employers to plainly violate labor law, and some advise companies to
adopt approaches which are considered lawful, but clearly violate the
law’s intentions. Either way, the strategies are effective in
silencing workers who wish to form unions, and in deterring egregious
employers.
-
The NLRA provides for weak remedies that take far too long to
implement. For example, a worker illegally fired for supporting a
union is entitled to reinstatement and backpay. But it can take years
before reinstatement is offered and the employers must only “make
victims whole” by providing backpay for the period between the firing
and until the worker finds a new job. When an illegal firing causes a
victim of unlawful conduct to lose a house, or a car, or health
insurance—the law provides no remedy.
-
The NLRA creates the potential for long delays in finalizing the
outcome of union representation elections. When workers choose to form
a union, an employer can readily delay the implementation of that
outcome for years by appealing to the NLRB. Remember the crisis caused
by the five-week delay in the outcome of Bush-Gore election? In union
representation elections, an employer can usually assure a delay that
is 20 times longer. And while a company can easily afford to drag out
the legal process, workers simply cannot.
- The NLRA ultimately fails to prevent violations of the law. If
the NLRB finds that an employer illegally fired an employee for their
support of a union, the employer is given a slap on the wrist. The
usual ‘punishment:’ providing the terminated worker with backpay and
posting a notice in the workplace alerting workers they won’t commit
the same violation again. Because the NLRA does little to discourage
illegal behavior or legal maneuvers which thwart the intention of the
law, few incentives exist for employers to stop discriminating against,
harassing, or firing workers who support a union.
|